Google Search  
Sawf News on mobile
Login
Register

Home
Bollywood
Slideshows
Entertainment
Fashion
Fashion Designers
Gossip
Health and Science
Lifestyle
Tech
Travel
About
Designer Swimwear 2009 - MBFW LA
Ed Hardy Swimwear
Ed Hardy Swimwear by Christian Audigier: Runway photos
Caroline D'Amore swimwear : Runway photos
Beach Bunny and swimwear : Runway photos

Designer Swimwear 2009 - MBFW Miami
Rosa Cha Swimwear
Ed Hardy Swimwear by Christian Audigier: Runway photos
Pistol Panties swimwear : Runway photos
Gottex bikini and swimwear : Runway photos
Rosa Cha bikini and swimwear : Runway photos
Ashley Paige bikini and swimwear : Runway photos
Beach Bunny Swimwear : Runway photos

Home > Entertainment
Previous Next
Japan court says Charlie Chaplin still holds copyrights
Posted on Wednesday, August 29, 2007 (EST)
A Japanese court on Wednesday ruled that late comedy icon Charlie Chaplin still holds the copyright for his work until 2015, in the first ruling of its kind.
 
Print this page
Email this page

A woman walks past a likeness of cinema great Charlie Chaplin
© AFP/DDP/File Roland Magunia

TOKYO (AFP) - The decision came as the Tokyo District Court ruled that two Tokyo-based DVD producers violated the copyrights of nine Chaplin movies by duplicating and selling cheap DVDs.

"Their copyright should be protected for 38 years after the death of the rights holder," presiding Judge Misao Shimizu said. "The authorship of the nine movies belongs to Chaplin."

The court suspended the sales of the DVDs and ordered the companies to pay 10.5 million yen (91,400 dollars) in compensation to the Roy Export Company Establishment, which holds the rights to Chaplin's movies.

Chaplin died in 1977. It was Japan's first ruling of its kind on the copyrights of a late film director.

The nine movies, released between 1919 and 1952, included Chaplin's celebrated parody of Adolf Hitler, "The Great Dictator," along with "Modern Times" and "The Gold Rush."

Roy Export had sought the suspension of the cheap DVDs and 94 million yen in compensation, arguing the companies violated the copyrights. The defendants contended the copyright protection period had expired.

©AFP

Add Your Comment



Section Headlines
Celebrity News
Celebrity Slideshows
Bollywood Celebrity News
Privacy